For the duration of the government’s pleasure, there
are no places of worship allowed to be open. Such is contrary to the terms of
the Magna Carta, and initiates a dangerous precedent for future governments of
all persuasions to close Churches on any pretense.
This is the second time this year, despite an agreement
being tacitly arranged after the first shutdown, that if Churches did not take
to the Courts, there would be no further closures.
Numerous Members of Parliament, including the previous
Prime Minister, have called on the present Prime Minister, to abandon his action
against Churches, but of course they are facing a man who has shown little
understanding or sympathy for the Christian view, indeed has supported
anti=Christian teaching.
The leaders of the Churches approached the government
over such unilateral action, and seemed to have been summarily dismissed. It is
only a short time ago that our leaders were
vigorously opposing government policy regarding their action on Brexit
as not being moral, I wonder if they were as forceful in challenging on Church closure.
A group of Welsh pastors challenged their government,
and as God’s law is superior to State law in Christian belief, in addition to
the support of the Constitution of the Magna Carta, and the Public Health Act of
1984, they were entitled to do so.
The Queen, who is nominally head of the Church, in her
Coronation oath, gave to the clergy authority to preserve the rights and
privileges as do or shall appertain to them. The European Court of Human Rights
also appears to contain against the government. In France the High Court ruled
against closing their Churches, and the German Chancellor has not closed her country’s
Churches.
The general tone of this government is to oppose all
moral norms. Having forced Northern
Ireland to accept abortion and same sex marriage against its will, they have
encouraged home abortions with disastrous consequences to some women; and since
March of this year, there have been 110,000 abortions in this country.
In falsely claiming that allowing Churches to open it
could lead to a spread of the virus, they have shown themselves disingenuous
and duplicitous in their lies, as both Scientific and Medicinal Societies have
stated there is no evidence to support this. Yet, at the same time they have
opened the Universities, where there is the biggest incidence of the virus and
the refusal of many students to obey the guidelines of the government.
There is a notable failure to stop the Church from
opening for secular purposes, such as acting as foodbanks and other social
activities, and whilst this is a notable and praiseworthy service by the
Churches and people, there is inconsistency and bias on the part of the government
I would never at one time have believed a Conservative
(named)Government of all Parties, would have acted in the manner this one has.
However, Conservative does not appear to be the right word in this instance.
A few weeks past, the government ruled that people
should not gather together, should distance 2 meters apart, and wear face masks.
All such calling was ignored as crowds swarmed on central London in protest,
and they all were allowed to carry on, (force of numbers).
I wonder what the outcome would have been if all
Christians had took similar action and continued Church worship, and said as Joshua,’
as for me I will follow the Lord’.
No comments:
Post a Comment